Legal Opinion
Shewfelt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 17, 1997No. Nos. 96-5009, 96-5010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
The Court of Federal Claims held that the United States had taken the contingent rights that the appellees had to redeem real property in California and awarded them just compensation. The real property had been deeded to the state for non-payment of county taxes, and the county where the property was located had sold it to the United States after the state, which had acquired title to the property, sold it to the county. The state’s sale of the property to the county extinguished the redemption rights. The Court of Federal Claims held that the involvement of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Board of Young Men's Christian Assns. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fred E. Langenegger, Steven W. Langenegger v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Turney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A., De C v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Texas State Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Emerald International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Hanford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.