Legal Opinion

Flowrider Surf, Ltd. v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 22, 2020No. 3:15-cv-01879Unknown

1Opinion

ee EYAL ENRE YE LER 0 14:1 Nc ec enh Antara Senn . □ 3 . SEP 2 2024) 4 | 0 GLERK US SISTRIC F COURT [gp 6 4 . g UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || FLOWRIDER SURF, LTD., a Canadian Case No.: 3: 15-cv-01 879-BEN-BLM 12 corporation; and SURF WAVES, LTD., a company incorporated in the United | ORDER SETTING AWARD OF 13 || Kingdom, FEES AND COSTS 14 Plaintiffs, [Doc. 309] 15 || 16 || PACIFIC SURF DESIGNS, INC.,a : 7 Delaware corporation, Defendant. 18 . 19 20 The Court has held that Defendant Pacific Surf Designs, Inc. (“PSD” or 21 |“Defendant”) is entitled to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API