Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 2010No. C901051CR, C901054CR A136881 (Control), A136882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, who was convicted following a jury trial of multiple counts of first-degree kidnapping, ORS 163.235(1), and various sexual offenses against each of the two victims, appeals. He assigns error to (1) the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress various inculpatory statements that he made dining police interrogation and (2) the trial court’s failure to merge the convictions on the multiple counts of first-degree kidnapping (which were predicated on separate theories) in each case into a single conviction. For the reasons that follow, we reject defendant’s first assignment of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. Roble-BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NiemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. Salazar-CastilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API