Vance v. Holloway
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a suit on a sworn account. The trial court held that Petitioner, Newton C. Vance, d/b/a Vanguard Production, was entitled to recover operating costs on the “Dawn” lease in which Respondent, Jim R. Holloway, owned a ⅛2 working interest. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals reversed and remanded, holding that Vance had failed to establish his ownership of the account. Pursuant to TEX.R.CIV.P. 483, we grant Newton C. Vance, d/b/a Vanguard Production’s application for writ of error and, without hearing oral argument, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rizk v. Financial Guardian Insurance Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jarvis v. Rocanville Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Woodhaven Partners, LTD v. Shamoun & Norman, LLP F/K/A Shoumoun Klatsky Norman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Andrews v. East Texas Medical Center-Athens, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
- Panditi v. Apostle, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Southern Management Services, Inc. v. SM Energy Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.