Legal Opinion
Distinti v. Cunningham
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 9, 1959No. 15236PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
The appellants are members of the ■International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America. They filed a motion in the *529District Court March 5, 1959, to intervene in the case there pending entitled Cunningham v. English, D.C., 175 F.Supp. 764. That litigation is described rather fully in the opinion of this court in English v. Cunningham, 106 U.S.App.D.C. -, 269 F.2d 517, rendered June 10, 1959.1 On April 24, 1959, the motion to intervene was denied by the order of the District Court which is the subject of this appeal.
Appellants contend they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Joseph S. Gullo and Vivian B. Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- John F. English v. John CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- United States v. RadiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- John F. English v. John CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
- Distinti v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Joseph Westenberg v. John F. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960