Legal Opinion

John F. English v. John Cunningham

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 7, 1959No. 415PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thé order of the Court of November 16, 1959, ante, p. 897, is amended to read as follows: “The motion to correct or amend the caption to designate or confirm the Board of Monitors as a party respondent is denied. Leave to file brief of the' Board, of Monitors in opposition to the petition for certiorari' is granted. The application for a stay of the judgment and_the motion of Anthony J. Distinti, Individually and as President of Local 277, I. B. T., et al., for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, are denied. The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Mozart G. RatnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. John F. English v. John CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. J. Raymond Dyer and Jean Russell Dyer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Harris v. PernsleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Brooks v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API