Legal Opinion

Oliphant v. Heath

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 24, 2017No. AC38221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Vorcelia Oliphant, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to open a judgment of nonsuit and denying her motion to reargue or reconsider the court's denial of her motion to open. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in denying her motions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following. The plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover damages that she allegedly sustained as a result of a motor vehicle accident. On June 20, 2014, the court issued a scheduling order, which, in part, provided that a pretrial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flater v. GraceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Speer v. Dept. of AgricultureConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Questell v. FaroghConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Oliphant v. HeathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API