State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, following a stipulated facts trial, for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer lacked probable cause to stop defendant and that the trial court “exceeded its statutory authority when it imposed a [DUII conviction] fee in excess of $130” under ORS 813.030 (2009). We write only to address defendant’s contention concerning the DUII conviction fee and reject his contention concerning the denial of his suppression motion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. GammonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014