Legal Opinion

State v. Gleason

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1990No. 87CR-1791; CA A49181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree. ORS 163.118. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for the appointment of an expert witness, arguing that it was necessary to his defense. We reverse and remand.

In a pretrial motion, defendant requested that the court authorize funds to retain an expert medical witness. Defendant submitted two affidavits in support of his motion. The first stated that the state would likely call medical doctors who were expected to testify that the infant victim died as a result of child abuse and that defense counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API