Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 17, 1979No. J64309, CA 13390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of ORS 487.540, driving under the influence of intoxicants. He assigns as error the denial of his pretrial motion for expenses for an expert witness with whom to challenge the accuracy of his breathalyzer results. The presiding judge had denied this motion for lack of county funds. The defendant also asserts it was error for the trial court to deny his motion to suppress the breathalyzer test results based on the denial of expenses for an expert witness.

ORS 135.055(2) provides:

"The person for whom counsel has been appointed is entitled to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API