Legal Opinion
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1339, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2016 Central Office Telephone, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1997No. 94-36116PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
108 F.3d 981
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1339, 97 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 2016
CENTRAL OFFICE TELEPHONE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 94-36116, 94-36156.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 8, 1996.
Decided Feb. 26, 1997.
1
Bruce M. Hall, James T. McDermott, Kathryn D. Whittaker, Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland, Oregon, and J. Richard Urrutia, James, Denecke & Harris, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.
2
David W. Carpenter, Joseph D. Kearney, Sidley & Austin,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. GTE Northwest, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1999