Legal Opinion
Couture v. UNUM Provident Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 2004No. 02 CIV. 7392(CM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MCMAHON, District Judge.
Roger Couture (“Couture”) filed this action against UNUM Provident Corporation (“UNUM”) and Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (“Paul Revere”) seeking disability benefits under a group long-term disability benefit plan (“Plan”) established by Couture’s former employer, Xylum Corporation (“Xylum”).
Before me now are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Couture alleges that defendants have unreasonably denied him long-term…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Del Greco v. CVS Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Suarato v. Building Services 32BJ Pension FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Badawy v. First Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Carroll v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Smith v. Champion International Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.