Legal Opinion
In re Hertz Corporation
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 2004PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to that Court with directions to remand to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Claimant was engaged by STARS (Special Travel Agency Representative Service Network), a marketing organization operated by Hertz Corporation. She visited travel agencies to *691promote Hertz’s products by distributing sales materials and making presentations. Within her assigned territory, claimant chose which agencies she would visit and when she would visit them,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Claim of WernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- O'Brien v. SpitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Matter of Yoga Vida NYC, Inc. v. Commissioner of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Browning v. Ceva Freight, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- In re the Claims of NoelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.