Legal Opinion
Solomen v. Redwood Advisory Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 2002No. 2:00-mj-00858PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
On February 16, 2000, plaintiff Cheryl Solomen (“Solomen”), filed suit against defendant Redwood Advisory Company (“Redwood”), alleging that Redwood had terminated her employment due to her 1997 pregnancy. Solomen brought her claims for pregnancy discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l) (1994), and the Pennsylvania Human Rights Act, 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. On January 31, 2002, I granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on both the state and federal claims. Defendant then moved for costs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Veneziano v. Long Island Pipe Fabrication & Supply Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Adams v. Teamsters Local 115District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- CARLSON v. QUALTEK WIRELESS LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022