Legal Opinion
Weiner v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1968No. L. A. 28683PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
This controversy presents questions of the proper construction and application of certain provisions of the Municipal Code of defendant City of Los Angeles as the;' relate to the minimum required setback and front yard requirements for a vacant lot which plaintiffs seek to develop for residential purposes. As hereinafter appears, we have concluded that the trial court erred in its conclusion that plaintiffs’ planned development complied with such requirements, and the judgment must accordingly be reversed.
The facts are substantially undisputed. In June 1963 plaintiffs purchased a vacant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goto v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Highland Development Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- City of Malibu v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Russell Center v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Malibu v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.