Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1928No. 4733PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge BISHOP

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The statement of this case and the question here presented are as shown by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion, as follows:

“This suit was brought in the name of the State pro forma for the use and benefit of Ellis County, Levee Improvement District No. 3, against appellees, to enforce collection of delinquent taxes for the years 1919-1921, inclusive, regularly levied on- and assessed against 292.2 acres of land situated within the district.
“The defense urged was that the claim for taxes due for the years 1919…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Ward County Irr. Dist. No. 1Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Ward County Irr. Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sam Bassett Lumber Co. v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Jimenez v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 2District Court, S.D. Texas · 1975
  4. State for Dallas County Bois D'Arc Island Levee Dist. v. GlennTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. State v. GlennTexas Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API