Legal Opinion
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Southern Paint & Glass Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 24, 1934Published
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.
The evidence is not set forth in the record, but what is in the record imports verity. The defendants excepted and assigned error to the following portion of the charge below which cannot be sustained:
“The court charges you, if you find the facts to be true as testified, reduce the liability of the guarantors to $303.00, and it appears from examination of the account that there was an erroneous charge of $1.50, that is protest fees on a protested check which was charged twice, which would leave the amount $301.50, for which, if you find the facts to be true as testified, the guarantors would…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stone Co. v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Stagg v. Spray Water Power & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Trustees of the Presbyterian Board of Publication & Sabbath-School Work v. GillifordIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Merchants Bank of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933