Legal Opinion

Salitan v. Divelbiss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1955No. 36684Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs in error brought an action to recover a money judgment against the defendant in error on three trade acceptances. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant and the judgment of the *725trial court was in accord with the Verdict. The plaintiffs have appealed.

The instruments in this suit are three original trade acceptances, payable to the order of Sterling Materials Company, Inc., all of which are dated May 18, 1951, at Medford, Oklahoma, and addressed to Ray Divelbiss and due respectively September 1, 1951, October 1, 1951, and November 1, 1951.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atterbury v. Bank of Washington HeightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Crockett v. RootSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Stevens v. WeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API