Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Ernest

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1924No. 15209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Ordinarily tlie presumption of negligence which arises against a railroad, company on proof of injury to personal property by the running of its train is a presumption only of the negligence alleged in the plaintiff’s petition, but where the suit was instituted in a justice’s court, and was based upon a summons, according to the practice in such courts, and there was no petition alleging any specific acts of negligence, the presumption will apply to, and therefore authorize a finding upon, any theoi-y of negligence deducible from the facts appearing from the evidence upon the trial (even…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. ConverseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Simons v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Davis v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Cox v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API