Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Ernest
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Ordinarily tlie presumption of negligence which arises against a railroad, company on proof of injury to personal property by the running of its train is a presumption only of the negligence alleged in the plaintiff’s petition, but where the suit was instituted in a justice’s court, and was based upon a summons, according to the practice in such courts, and there was no petition alleging any specific acts of negligence, the presumption will apply to, and therefore authorize a finding upon, any theoi-y of negligence deducible from the facts appearing from the evidence upon the trial (even…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. ConverseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Simons v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Davis v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clarke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Cox v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925