Legal Opinion

United States v. Ghavami

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 2014No. 10 Cr. 1217(KMW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge:

After a month-long trial, Defendants Peter Ghavami (“Ghavami”), Gary Heinz (“Heinz”), and Michael Welty (‘Welty”) (collectively, “Defendants”) were convicted of conspiracies to defraud municipal bond issuers, the .United States Department of Treasury, and the Internal Revenue Service, by manipulating the bidding process for municipal bond investment products and other municipal finance products, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1349. Heinz and Ghavami were also convicted of substantive wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

Welty now…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AbdallaDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. United States v. BoguckiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API