United States v. Ghavami
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge:
After a month-long trial, Defendants Peter Ghavami (“Ghavami”), Gary Heinz (“Heinz”), and Michael Welty (‘Welty”) (collectively, “Defendants”) were convicted of conspiracies to defraud municipal bond issuers, the .United States Department of Treasury, and the Internal Revenue Service, by manipulating the bidding process for municipal bond investment products and other municipal finance products, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1349. Heinz and Ghavami were also convicted of substantive wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
Welty now…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. AbdallaDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States v. BoguckiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018