Legal Opinion

Usher v. Henkel

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9518PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment against him in an action to quiet title to a certain parcel of land in Los Angeles County. It was stipulated at the trial that the Southern Land Company, a corporation, became the owner of the property by deed dated July 10, 1916. In 1922, the plaintiff received a tax deed from the tax collector of Los Angeles County for the property involved in the action and subsequently commenced an action against the said Southern Land Company and procured a decree against the said company quieting his title to said property.

The defendant claims title to the property by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Damato v. SlevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Southern Land Co. v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Nathan v. American Photoplayer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Lloyd Myers Co., Inc., And/or Lloyd Myers, D/B/A Lloyd Myers Co., Inc. v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API