Legal Opinion

Darling v. Thompson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Kalkaska; Aldrich, J. Case by Gilbert Darling against Robert N. Thompson and Harriet H. Stone for damages resulting from the giving way of a dam, alleged to have been caused by defendants’ negligence. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff’s dam and mill, situate upon the Boardman river, were injured by a flood, which he charges to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants, who owned a dam about half a mile above the plaintiff’s dam. A judgment for $1,200 was recovered, and the defendants have appealed.

The most comprehensive question raised by the record is whether the court should have directed a verdict for the *217defendants. The theory of the plaintiff is that the defendants’ dam was constructed and maintained in a faulty manner and condition. He asserts that upon the upstream side, near the flume,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. DooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Osborn v. League Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Smith v. Smith, Sturgeon & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API