Legal Opinion
Oakville Development Corporation, Trustee of the 10-12 Lopez St. Trust v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 4, 1993No. 92-1976PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Oakville Development Corporation (Oakville) challenges orders issued by two different district judges which had the combined effect of allowing a foreclosure sale to proceed. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss Oakville’s appeal as moot.
I
Oakville borrowed $78,000 from First American Bank. The loan was evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a second mortgage on a parcel of real property located at 10-12 Lopez Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts. On October 19, 1990, the bank was declared insolvent and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Alternative System Concepts, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Cmm Cable Rep., Inc., D/B/A Creative Media Management, Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc., D/B/A Wpor-FmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Aurora Loan Services, Inc. v. Frank Craddieth and Peggy Craddieth, Appeal Of: Midwest Real Estate Investment Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Cruz v. FarquharsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Matos Ex Rel. Matos v. Clinton School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.