California Tow Truck Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en bane, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The panel has voted to amend the opinion. The amended opinion is attached hereto.
The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied. No further petitions for rehearing will be permitted.
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
The City and County of San Francisco requires tow truck drivers and towing firms…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen Miller v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Ying Ye v. GlobalTranz Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- United Motorcoach Assn, Inc. v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- ArcBest II, Inc. v. OliverDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Colorado Motor v. Town of VailCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.