Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bradham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County;.P. .0. Simons, Judge Pro Tem. Action by D. M. Bradham against the Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Eailway Company. Jtidgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, J.
On April 16, 1908, a judgment was rendered in the above-entitled case in favor of de^fendant in error. April 17, 1908, plaintiff in error filed its motion for a new trial. May 14, 1908, the motion for new trial, coming on for hearing, was by the court overruled, to which the plaintiff in error saved its exceptions, and time was given within which to make, serve and have signed and settled a case-made for appeal to the Supreme Court. In due season these proceedings were had, and the petition in error with the case-made attached were on the 21st day of April, 1909, lodged in the office of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- McMurtry v. ByrdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Court of Honor v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Walton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Manes v. HossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Coleman v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Watkins v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hartsell v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Tupelo Townsite Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.