Legal Opinion

Tupelo Townsite Co. v. Cook

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1914No. 5102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Coal County; Robert M. Rainey, Judge. Action by V. S. Cook against the Tupelo Townsite Company and others, for foreclosure of mortgage, and defendant S. B. Brooks filed cross-petition. Judgment for plaintiff, and judgment for Brooks on cross-petition, and the Tupelo Townsite Company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.

V. S. Cook filed his petition in the court below against Tupelo Townsite Company et al., defendants, C. M. Witter not being made a defendant, for judgment and foreclosure of mortgage. S. B. Brooks, defendant, filed his cross-petition against Tupelo Townsite Company and C. M. Witter, for foreclosure of mortgage. On the 21st day of December, 1912, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff Cook and against Tupelo Townsite Company et al., and on the same day judgment was entered in favor of Brooks on his cross-petition and against Tupelo Townsite Company and C. M. Witter. A motion for a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BradhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Watson v. ReinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diamond v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Buckner v. Walton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Weaver v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API