People v. Jackson

The defendant’s contention that the verdict was repugnant because the jury found him guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree while acquitting him of attempted robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise this issue before the jury was discharged (see People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987 [1985]; People v Shamsiddeen, 98 AD3d 694 [2012]; People v Ariza, 77 AD3d 844, 845-846 [2010]; People v Hall, 56 AD3d 798 [2008]). In any event, viewing the elements of the offenses as charged to the jury (see People v Muhammad, 17 NY3d 532, 539…