Legal Opinion
Noordam v. Vickers, Inc.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 2003No. A-02-769PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Vickers, Incorporated, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court review panel affirming the trial court’s decision. Vickers contends that the review panel erred in finding Robert Noordam suffered a 15-percent loss in earning capacity. Vickers also contends that the review panel erred because it failed to correctly apply the rebuttable presumption of correctness set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-162.01(3) (Cum. Supp. 2002). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
II. BACKGROUND
On March 6, 2000, Noordam filed a petition in the Workers’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Variano v. Dial Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Brummer v. Vickers, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brouilette v. DBV Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Swanson v. Park Place AutomotiveNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Ladd v. COMPLETE CONCRETE, INC.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kam v. IBP, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
- Goeser v. Van Meter, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2020