Legal Opinion
Matney v. Barrick Gold of North America
District Court, D. Utah
Decided April 21, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00275Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION COLE MATNEY and PAUL WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION vs. Case No. 2:20-cv-275-TC-CMR BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BARRICK U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BENEFITS COMMITTEE; and JOHN DOES 1-30, Defendants. Plaintiffs Cole Matney and Paul Watts are participants in the retirement plan (the Plan) that Defendant Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. (Barrick) offers its employees. They bring…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.