Legal Opinion
Sturdevant v. Haferman
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 6, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-C-1144PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before this court are (1) Magistrate Judge Aaron E. Goodstein’s recommendation on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, (2) plaintiffs post-recommendation motions to amend his complaint, and (3) plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel. For the reasons below, this court adopts the magistrate judge’s recommendation, denies defendants’ motion to dismiss, and denies plaintiff’s motions to amend his complaint and for appointment of counsel.
Background
On November 15, 1990, pro se plaintiff Norbert Sturdevant (“Sturdevant”), an…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arty Larnell Hamlin v. Dick Vaudenberg, Captain Hoover, Captain JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Smith v. McCaughtryDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Tracy v. BittlesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Casteel v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Casteel v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.