Legal Opinion

Seley-Radtke v. Hosmane

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 22, 2016No. 19/16Published

1Opinion of the Court

Katherine Seley-Radtke v. Ramachandra S. Hosmane, No. 19, September Term, 2016 PURELY PRIVATE DEFAMATION – STANDARD OF PROOF TO OVERCOME COMMON LAW CONDITIONAL PRIVILEGE – PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE – Court of Appeals held that standard of proof required to overcome common law conditional privilege in purely private defamation action is preponderance of evidence; clear and convincing evidence is not required to overcome conditional privilege based in common law and not in First Amendment. Court of Appeals concluded that important State interest of protecting private individuals from defamation…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API