Legal Opinion
Ex Parte La Prade
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 22, 1933No. 21, OriginalPublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
Arthur T. La Prade, Attorney General of Arizona, applied for leave to file a tendered petition for writ of mandamus requiring Circuit Judge Wilbur and two district judges, constituting a United States district court in that State, to dismiss as to petitioner two suits in equity1 to which the court, against his opposition, had made him a party defendant in substitution for his predecessor in office. We directed the judges to show cause why the leave prayed should not be granted, assigned the cáse for argument, directed briefs to be filed on or before the day set, stayed proceedings against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Associated Industries of New York State, Inc. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.