Legal Opinion

People v. Romeo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2009PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Acting Chief Judge Ciparick.

The question raised by this appeal is whether the People’s lengthy postindictment delay occasioned by delaying their prosecution in favor of a Canadian prosecution violated defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial. Applying the five-factor speedy trial analysis articulated in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442 [1975]), we conclude that it did and therefore affirm.

I

In November 1985, a fatal shooting occurred in the victim’s Fire Island home, in Suffolk County. Ballistics evidence taken over a year later indicated that a gun belonging to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Kee v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. People v. DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. WigginsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  4. People v. FelicianoNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. ScaringeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API