Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronald Brown Whitman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1982No. 80-1226PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Whitman was convicted after a jury trial on two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1014 1 by making false statements to a federally insured bank. On appeal, Whitman contends that 1) the indictment was impermissibly amended, 2) a fatal variance occurred between the indictment and the evidence presented at trial, 3) the evidence of intent was insufficient, 4) the jury instruction on the elements of the offense was erroneous, 5) various evidentiary rulings were erroneous, and 6) the prosecutor’s closing rebuttal argument was improper. We find these contentions to be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Giordano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Tyrone Smith, United States of America v. Anthony E. GartrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Louis Martin Radetsky, A/K/A L. M. RadetskyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Lorenzo Jesus Mejia-AlarconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Jim R. Hunter v. State of New Mexico Attorney General of the State of New Mexico Robert J. Tansey, Warden, New Mexico State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael A. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. David v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.