Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Harris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 2009No. 5-07-0205Published

1DissentJustice Goldenhersh

I respectfully dissent. My colleagues approach this appeal in terms of the scope of review of the trial judge’s decision not to recharacterize defendant’s petition for relief from judgment. While I agree with Justice Spomer more generally on this point, the core issue of this appeal is the Whitfield issue and the failure to follow People v. Company, 376 Ill. App. 3d 846, 876 N.E.2d 1055 (2007).

As to recharacterization, I disagree with Justice Spomer’s position that if a judge declines to review the terms of possible recharacterization, “that choice is nonreviewable.” 391 Ill. App. 3d at 251…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. ShellstromIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Theodore Baker v. Frederick Finkbeiner, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. McCoyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API