Crown Woodworking Co. v. Goodwin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The issue in this case is whether the removal of a blind eye necessitated by an industrial accident is compensable as an “eye lost” within the specific scheduled benefits provided for in the permanent partial disability section of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. When the disability is partial in character but permanent in quality RSA 281:26 XII provides for compensation as follows: “Eye lost, one hundred and eighteen weeks’ compensation, plus for actual healing period not in excess of twenty weeks’ compensation.” Another related subdivision of the same section of this statute (RSA 281:26…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Purchase v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. ThrashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- FLORIDA GAME & FRESH WATER FISH COM'N v. DriggersSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957