Legal Opinion

Pacific Railways Advertising Co. v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1929No. Docket No. 6558PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODELL, J., pro tem.

This appeal was taken from a judgment and decree permanently enjoining the City of Oakland, the members of its council, its chief of police and its city attorney from enforcing an ordinance prohibiting commercial advertising on the exterior sides of street-cars. The decree declared the ordinance to be unconstitutional and void.

The following facts are alleged in the complaint and not denied: The plaintiff Key System Transit Company, a Cali fomia corporation, operating a street railway system under franchises from the City of Oakland and the county of Alameda, made a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Varney & Green v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Fifth Avenue Coach Co. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. OsborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. City of Daytona Beach v. AbdoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. In Re LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. GoodspeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Premier-Pabst Sales Co. v. State Board of EqualizationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API