Greathouse v. Capital Plus Financial, LLC
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ERIC GREATHOUSE, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. No. 4:22-CV-0686-P CAPITAL PLUS FINANCIAL LLC, ET AL., Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 31, 34, 36). For the reasons stated below, the motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED. To the extent Defendants seek to dismiss Plaintiffs’ other claims, the motions are DENIED. INTRODUCTION In 2020, Congress put their trust—to the tune of $800…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.