Legal Opinion

Bordelon v. Dauzat

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1962No. 607PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This is a suit to cancel a mortgage on the ground that there was no consideration for the note secured thereby and also that the petitioner was misled into signing it by misrepresentation and error. It is a companion suit to Dauzat v. Bordelon, La.App., 145 So.2d 41, rendered this same date, a foreclosure suit by the holder of the note which was secured by the mortgage sought to be cancelled herein. .

For the reasons stated in the cited companion suit, by which we concluded that the note in question was supported by valid consideration, the judgment herein ordering cancellation of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dauzat v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dauzat v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API