Dauzat v. Bordelon

TATE, Judge.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage securing a note in the amount of $1540. The defendant’s answer pleaded that no consideration had been given for the note and that it was signed through error and *42misrepresentation.1 The plaintiffs foreclosure suit was dismissed, and he appeals.

The oral evidence was not transcribed. However, a stipulation of facts was entered into by the parties subsequent to the trial, and our learned trial brother, in his reasons for denying a new trial, fully stated the pertinent facts and his reasons for judgment as follows:

“This entire transaction started…