Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided September 30, 2009No. Case CR 07-1244 WJPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF ADINA SCHWARTZ

WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Adina Schwartz [Doc. 372], filed July 13, 2009. Having considered the parties’ written and oral arguments as well as the applicable law, and after considering the testimony of Adina Schwartz, Ph.D. (“Dr. Schwartz”), the Court finds that the motion is well taken and shall be GRANTED.

INTRODUCTION

The Defendant is charged in the Superseding Indictment [Doc. 82] with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Byron MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edwin VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WillockDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. United States v. OteroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  3. People v. GivensNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ricks v. PauchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API