Legal Opinion

N-M-A

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3368PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3368 In re N-M-A-, Applicant Decided October 21, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Under

8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)(i) (1998), where an asylum applicant has shown that he has been persecuted in the past on account of a statutorily-protected ground, and the record reflects that country conditions have changed to such an extent that the asylum applicant no longer has a well-founded fear of persecution from his original persecutors, the applicant bears the burden of demonstrating that he has a well-founded fear…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
  2. Jalloh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Viollca Brucaj v. John D. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Mehmeti v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Kone v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API