State v. Harada
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
Opinion of
2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · AcobaAcoba, J.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the force of the Crown. It may be frail—its roof may shake—the wind may blow through it—the storm may enter, the rain may enter—but the King of England cannot enter—all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement!
Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360, 378-79, 79 S.Ct. 804, 3 L.Ed.2d 877 (1959) (Douglas, J., dissenting) (quoting 15 Hansard, Parliamen*41tary History of England (1753-1765), at 1307), overruled in part by Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523, 87 S.Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d…
3Cases cited53 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.