Legal Opinion
Ammann v. Home Investment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1957No. Nos. 14587, 14632, UndocketedPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
I
We have before us for disposition in the instant proceeding a motion of mov-ents Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, (hereafter referred to as “Bank”) Home Loan Bank Board, A. V. Ammann and George K. Bramley praying for an order of this Court which directs remand and dismissal of certain appeals from the. United States District Court for the Southern District of California which are now pending in this Court. We set out verbatim in the mar*750gin the pertinent portions of the motion of the moving parties.1
Parties in and to the Mallonee Litigation who are before' us…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Mallonee v. FaheyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Mallonee v. FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
- A. v. Ammann, George K. Bramley, Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Home Investment Co., Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association, Title Service Company, Robert H. Wallis v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Martínez v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- United States v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004