Shideler v. Tribe of the Sioux
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. William Hutchinson, Judge. ■ Action for injunction. Plaintiff’s petition was dimissed and the injunction denied. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
I. The members of the defendant association are good Indians, representative young business men of Sioux City, incorporated for a proper purpose, to wit, to advance the business interests of their .home city. The evidence is undisputed, and the question is whether, under the facts, they have violated section 2404 and other provisions of the Code in dispensing and distributing intoxicating liquor to their members and visiting guests.
*419The facts, as shown by the record, are, as testified to by the secretary of the organization, who was called as a witness for plaintiff: That the defendant Tribe…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- South Shore Country Club v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. CoosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Sawyer v. BottiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- State v. CroganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- State v. MullenhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jacobs v. City of CharitonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Scott v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Dutton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- State ex rel. Woodbury County Anti-Saloon League v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.