Sawyer v. Botti
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Woodbury District Court. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. In an action to enjoin defendant Botti, as dealer, and defendants Enright and Meyers, as owners of premises on which the business was conducted, from selling, etc., intoxicating liquors on said premises, and maintaining a nuisance thereon, the court entered a decree for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.
It appears that prior to the institution of this action defendant Botti had been engaged in running a fruit and confectionery store on premises belonging' to the other defendants, and that in his place of business he had a soda fountain and handled the usual soft drinks. Among the beverages which he thus handled, assuming that its sale was not prohibited by law, was one known as “justus beer.” Although the prayer of the petition was in the usual form for an injunction against the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors, the trial court, finding as a fact that after the filing of the petition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FredericksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- State v. CloughlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- State v. O'ConnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
- Donnelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. SpiersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- State v. DahnkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- State v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Nies v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.