Legal Opinion
Davita Inc. v. Nephrology Associates, P.C.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided March 25, 2003No. CV102-077PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, Chief Judge.
Defendants move for partial dismissal of Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Total Renal Care, Inc. (“TRC”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Plaintiff DaVita, Inc. (Complaint ¶ 6.) TRC operates several outpatient kidney dialysis centers in Georgia, including two in Augusta, and one each in Louisville, Waynesboro, Vidalia, and Statesboro. (Id. ¶ 5.)
Defendants Nephrology Associates and Nephrology Centers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Information Systems and Networks Corp. v. The City of Atlanta, Herbert L. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Beck v. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Fieldturf USA Inc. v. Tencate Thiolon Middle East, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- US Dominion, Inc. v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021