City Express, Inc. v. Express Partners
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NAKAYAMA, Justice.
Respondent-appellant/cross-appellee Express Partners filed an appeal of this action after a directed verdict was entered in favor of petitioners-appellees/cross-appellants Architects 2, Inc., Douglas Sonoda, and Lloyd Sako [hereinafter collectively referred to as Architects 2]. The Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for a new trial. We granted certiorari to address the application of the economic loss rule to a negligence action between an owner and an architect who are in privity of contract. Because we hold that the circuit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Sheridan Area Water Supply Joint Powers BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moransais v. HeathmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Association of Apartment Owners of Newtown Meadows Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Venture 15, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. v. Mandalay Resort GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Burlington Insurance v. United Coatings Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.