Legal Opinion

Florio v. Kennedy

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 22, 1981No. 46842Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

The named defendant, Dr. James Kennedy, M.D., has moved to dismiss this complaint on the grounds that at all times relevant he was an employee of the Commonwealth and therefore not liable to suit under G.L. c. 258, sec. 2. Since the parties have submitted this motion on affidavits, I treat it as a motion for summary judgment: Mass.R. Civ. P. 12(b).

The issue of whether a physidan who provides medical services at fadlities of the Commonwealth is an employee of the Commonwealth for the purposes of the Tort Claims Act, G.L. c.258, sec. 2, is one of fact.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Vanaman Ex Rel. Vanaman v. Milford Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  3. Stanley Lee West, Sr. And Faye West, as Next Friends and Parents of Stanley Lee West, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Evans v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Davis v. DelRossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API