Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1995No. 1994-2654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 45.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MESI. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi,

1995-Ohio-69.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Conviction for misprision—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice law—Continuing multiple employment that adversely affects professional judgment on behalf of client without client's consent after full disclosure— Neglecting an entrusted legal matter—Failing to preserve the identity…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShorallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Matter of Discipline of RussellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. MargolisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. EwingOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. NorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API